Confession To Jesuits No 27: The Treaty of Verona Kept Hidden From Americans

This treaty and its indictment of the Vatican and Jesuit Order was put in the Congressional Record by American patriots. Now our Congress has kept this hidden from the people and shows clearly Capitol Hill is now filled with traitors.

By Greg Szymanski
April 29, 2007

In this 27th Confession to the Jesuits we look at the importance of The
Treaty of Verona as a key to understanding the Vatican and Jesuit Order's control over the U.S. government and most other world governments.
 

The following information was gathered by the late truth-seeker and
patriot, Jim Arrabito, who was assassinated by the Jesuit Order in an
Alaskan plane crash.

One of the articles he left us before his untimely death should be read
as a starting point for understanding the real spiritual controllers of
the New World Order -- The Vatican and its henchmen of the Jesuit Order.

JESUIT

Vatican Tyranny

ORIGINALLY INSTITUTED (Portugal/Spain,1534) BY THE VATICAN, FOR THE SOLE
PURPOSE OF EXTERMINATING THE REFORMATION,

THE ORDER WAS SUPPRESSED 21 JULY 1773 BY POPE CLEMENT XIV (for which he
was promptly poisoned). THE ORDER WAS

RE-INSTITUTED 1814 AND GIVEN THE "SECRET TREATY OF VERONA"

FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF CARRYING OUT ITS DICTATES.

THIS EDICT WAS FINALLY RATIFIED BY ITS CONTRACTING PARTIES OCT 1822:
CAUSING PRESIDENT JAMES MONROE, WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THOMAS JEFFERSON,
UPON LEARNING OF ITS EXISTENCE, TO WRITE THE MONROE DOCTRINE, AS RECORDED
IN THE: CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE., VOLUME 53, PART 7, PAGE 6781 OF THE
64th CONGRESS, 1st SESSION, 25 April 1916.



THIS WORK IS DEDICATED TO EX-JESUIT PRIEST: DR. ALBERTO ROMERO RIVERA,
WHO'S LIFE STORY INSPIRED.



"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but
inwardly they are ravening wolves."

(Matt,7:15)


I read a book some years ago that started my research, that I am
still involved in today. The information I have, I believe, if it were
ever brought to a trial, would prove so conclusively of what I am about
to tell you that not even the perpetrators themselves would try to deny
it. In the past, when confronted with their prior history of atrocities,
their only response has been: "we don't do that anymore", or sneer at its
improbability, or a gratuitous imputation of bigotry and intolerance
against the writer, while at the same time telling all their followers:
"we never change". As you read it will become only to apparent that the
latter is the case.

Before I begin, and you start thinking I'm an "extremist", let me
say that I'm not the only person to find this information. It is readily
available (at the finger tips of those on the internet) to anyone willing
to put in a little time and research. I have found, what I believe to
be, the common denominator for a very large percentage (if not all) of
the events perpetrated and/or carried out by departments of government
and/or its agencies, that are totally negative to the rights and freedoms
of the American people, hence, also to the United States Constitution,
its Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence. This
organization is responsible for the wholesale slaughter of multi-millions
of peoples all over the world. It is responsible for the "Dark Age"
(inquisition) period leading up to the founding of this country: As you
will learn, this organization, though having periods of civil and
military power fluctuation (due to losses from their own tyrannical acts
and resultant exposure) not only still exists: but is far more powerful
(lethal) today than ever before: This is especially true in the United
States, where the order has its highest concentration (at least seventeen
times that of any other country).

A zeal for the discovery of new territory marked the fifteenth
century. The first navigations for this purpose were concerted and
directed by prince Henry. Born 1394, the fourth son of John I. king of
Portugal. His valor in the assault and capture of the city: Ceuta in
Africa 1415, presaged the fame he afterward acquired. From this period
he devoted himself to naval expeditions for the discovery of unknown
countries. His ships subjected divers parts of Africa and the
neighboring islands to the dominion of Portugal. After the success in
doubling cape Bojadoy, he gave to his father and successors all the land
he discovered, or might discover, and applied to Pope Martin V to ratify
the donation. He engaged that in all their expeditions the Portuguese
should have mainly in view the extension of the Roman church and
authority of its pontiff. Pope Martin granted the prince's request. In
his bull of ratification, which was about the year 1430, it is declared
that: "whatever might be discovered from the said cape to the utmost
India, should pertain to the Portuguese dominion." Edward, brother of
prince Henry, succeeded to the throne of Portugal 1433, on the death of
John I. Pope Eugene IV. by his bull in 1438, ratified, to Edward, the
grant made by Martin V. A bull of Nicholas V. dated 8 Jan 1454, refers
to the aforesaid bulls of his predecessors, Martin and Eugene. It
recites the declaration prince Henry made of his achievements "that for
25 years he had not ceased to send annually almost an army" of
Portuguese, "with the greatest dangers, labors and charges, in the most
swift ships, to search out the sea and maritime provinces toward the
southern parts and Antarctic Pole." that these ships "came at length to
the province of Guinea, and took possession of some islands, havens and
sea adjoining" that "sailing further, war was waged for some years with
the people of those parts, and very many islands near thereunto were
subdued and peaceably possessed, and were still possessed with the
adjacent sea" that "many Guineans and other negroes were taken then by
force, and some by barter." The bull describes Henry as "a true soldier
of Christ, a most courageous defender and intrepid champion of the faith,
aspiring from his early youth with his utmost might to have the glorious
name of Christ published, extolled and revered throughout the world." It
recognizes the exclusive right of Portugal to the acquisitions and
possessions aforesaid, in virtue of the letters of Popes Martin and
Eugene, which granted to the king of Portugal and prince Henry "free and
ample faculty to invade, search out, expunge, vanquish and subdue all
pagans and enemies of Christ whosesoever placed, and their persons to
reduce to perpetual slavery, and all their kingdoms, possessions and
goods to apply and appropriate," etc. Pope Nicholas's letter then goes
on to "decree and declare, the acquests already made, and what hereafter
shall happen to be acquired, after that they shall be acquired, have
pertained, and forever of right do belong and pertain to the aforesaid
king and his successors, and not to any others whatever." It forbids, on
the severest penalties, all Christian powers from settling in the
countries discovered by the Portuguese, or any way molesting them in
their expeditions for the discovery and conquest of unknown countries.
It speaks of prince Henry's plan and his prosecution of it as "a most
pious work, and most worthy of perpetual remembrance, wherein the glory
of God, where the interest of the commonwealth of the universal church
are concerned."

Thus was prince Henry's views and operations sanctioned by the
highest authority, at that time, acknowledged in Christendom. A right
derived from a source so venerable was then undisputed. The Roman
pontiff bound princes at his pleasure, and as Vicar of Christ, was
allowed to have at his disposal all the kingdoms of the earth. This
grant of Pope Nicholas was confirmed by his successor: Calixtus III. 6
August 1458.

On the death of Edward, his son Alphonsus, then in his minority,
succeeded to the throne of Portugal, 1438, and died 1481. Prince Henry
died 1460-63. At his death the spirit of discovery languished, but
revived with the accession of John II., son of Alphonsus. The year after
his accession (1482), sent an embassy to Edward IV. of England, to
acquaint him with the title acquired by the Pope's bull to the conquest
in Guinea: requesting him to dissolve a fleet, which some English
merchants were fitting for the Guinea (slave) trade. The king of England
showed great respect to the ambassadors and granted all they required.
The king of Portugal assumed, and the king of England gave him, this
style, Rex Portugalie et Algarbiorum citra at ultra mare in Africa. Pope
Sixtus IV., not long before his death(12 Aug 1484), confirmed all the
grants made by his predecessors, to the kings of Portugal and their
successors.

In 1481 John II. sent 100 artificers, 500 soldiers, and all
necessities to build a fort in Guinea. The large kingdoms of Benin and
Congo were discovered 1484-85, and the Cape of Good Hope 1486. The
Portuguese built forts and planted colonies in Africa: established a
commercial intercourse with the powerful kingdoms, and compelled the
petty princes, by force of arms, to acknowledge themselves vassals.

At this period, and by these means, the power and commerce of the
Portuguese in Africa were well established. The wholesome decrees of
five successive Roman pontiffs granted, conveyed and confirmed to the
most faithful king a right to appropriate the kingdoms, goods and
possessions of all infidels, wherever to be found, "to reduce their
persons to perpetual slavery or destroy them from the earth", for the
declared purpose of bringing the Lord's sheep into one dominical fold,
under one universal pastor. Succeeding kings of Portugal have not
forfeited the large grant by any undutiful ness to their holy father.
Portugal long enjoyed the trade to Africa and the East Indies without
interference of any European power. For more than half a century, before
exporting any negroes from Africa, she made and held them slaves in their
native country.

The Portuguese first imported slaves into Hispaniola 1508, and into
their Brazilian colonies 1517. Their sugar works were first set up in
these colonies 1580. Their union with Spain, at that time, was most
unfortunate for them. The Dutch became their enemy, who took their
East-India and Brazilian conquests and parts of their African colonies.
They recovered Brazil and their African establishments 1640, but not that
of India.

After the Dutch gave up Brazil and the gold mines were discovered,
the trade of Portugal improved and a great importation of slaves took
place: carrying yearly from Loangro to Brazil: 25,000, also many
thousands from Goango and Cape Lopos. They themselves say they carry to
Brazil 50,000 and more every year from Melinda, on the Mozambique coast.
Such had been the increase of their Brazilian and African colonies for a
century that their increase in English goods, annually, was greater than
that of Portugal and Spain combined prior to 1700.

Spanish America received slaves from the Genoese, Portuguese,
French and English. Every state purchased from Spain seceded from the
union (1861). The Vatican was the only country to acknowledge
sovereignty to the Confederacy. Before, during and long after the
African slave trade ended: the heads of state of Spain and Portugal were
addressed (and may still be), in formal title, by foreign
dignitaries/heads of state, as: "His/Her Catholic Majesty" (U.S. State
Dept. records): thereby acknowledging them, only, as emissaries of the
pope.

Catholic priest's dealing in the African slave trade is testified
to, in this poem, by the famous nineteenth century poet, J.G. Whittier:





A poem, on the slave block in New Orleans.

THE CHRISTIAN SLAVE

BY J. G. WHITTIER

A CHRISTIAN! going, gone!

Who bids for Gods own image?-for His grace

Which this poor victim of the market-place

Hath in her suffering won?



My God! can such things be?

Hast thou not said that whatsoe'er is done

Unto Thy weakest and Thy humblest one,

Is even done to thee?



In that sad victim, then,

Child of Thy pitying love, I see Thee stand,

Once more the jest-word of a mocking band,

Bound, sold, and scourged again!



A Christian up for sale!

Wet with her blood your whips-o'ertask her frame,

Make her life loathsome with your wrong and shame,

Her patience shall not fail!



Cheers for the turbaned bey

Of robber-peopled tunis! he hath torn

The dark slave-dungeons open, and hath borne

Their inmates into day:



But our poor slave in vain

Turns to the Christian shrine her aching eyes-

Its rites will only swell her market price,

And rivet on her chain.



God of all right! how long

Shall priestly robbers at Thine alter stand,

Lifting in prayer to thee the bloody hand

And haughty brow of wrong!



O, from the fields of cane,

From the low rice-swamp, from the traders cell-

From the black slave-ship's foul and loathsome hell,

And coffle's weary chain-



Hoarse, horrible, and strong,

Rises to heaven that agonizing cry,

Filling the arches of the hollow sky,

How Long, O Lord, how long!


For those who think the Vatican's attitude, toward black people,
may have changed through the ages bear this in mind: (1)the biggest race
riot in American history(1864, Brooklyn, New York City) was instigated by
Archbishop Hughes (in response to Lincoln creating a draft for more union
soldiers), including the burning, and trampling to death of the
occupants, of a black orphanage. (2)when the U.S. Army occupied Rome
during WWII, Pope Pius XII made it clear to American generals there were
to be no black soldiers garrisoned in Rome. (3)over 80% of St. Louis, New
York City, Chicago etc. police are Knights of Columbus: bear this in mind
when you learn that over 75% of these cops sell drugs; and when
reviewing the facts of the Fred Hampton murder by the Chicago police, 4
Dec 69, 6:00AM: every shot fired in the apartment was from fully
automatic weapons used by the police (no return fire); Amadou Diallo:
four cops randomly "check out" Diallo: telling him to show his I.D.:
while reaching for his wallet, in compliance with their "order" the cops
open up on him: 41 shots fired, 19 striking his body: one bullet
traveling almost vertically up each lower leg and another thru the bottom
of the right shoe, proves Diallo was flat on his back when the shots were
fired: Diallo was unarmed. Officer McMellon - bruised his tail bone
falling from stoop; officer Carroll - injured his ankle in fall from
steps: evidently, these four of "New Yorks finest" conducted themselves
with all of the professionalism and expertise of Daffy Duck. If this is
"New Yorks finest" I can't imagine what could possibly be their worst.
The cops, defense lawyers and judge all had a party after the trial.
Every unarmed black being shot in New York City (by police) is a working
immigrant. Special Forces Group's (snipers) have been giving weapons
training (and illegally selling weapons) to the KKK in Alabama in
exchange for info on black leaders that lead to the murder of Martin
Luther King Jr. and was financed through, New Orleans godfather: Carlos
Marcello (direct associate of J. Edgar Hoover: Knight of Malta; 33d
degree Mason). Portuguese, Raul Maori (director of James Earl Rays
movements and actions that set him up as a patsy: actual shooter of
Martin Luther King Jr.) is a drugs and weapons smuggler for Carlos
Marcello. To see a direct connection between the KKK, GBI and the FBI,
see the docudrama: "Who Murdered Atlanta's Children?" Blacks are being
systematically squeezed out of welfare, while legal and illegal catholic
immigrants receive unending welfare. Blacks fear the police more than
street gangs. Every American city has a predominate catholic influence,
and the proportion of mafia/catholic power and influence and crime rate
is consistent from city to city: http://www.thelinkup.org

Entire tribes of western American Indians were annihilated under
the direct orders of the brown robed butchers, i.e. Coronado and his
Spanish Conquistadors 1519-1540's. Not to mention the Aztecs and Incas
of Mexico, Central and South America, Cuba, Haiti, Grenada, Guam,
Philippines etc. With the likes of Almagro, Cortez, Pizarro, Valverde,
de Meza, Gregory, Sepulveda, Valega and, yes, Christopher Columbus
(imprisoned by Queen Isabella of Spain for his atrocities against the
natives of Grenada), robbing them of all their national wealth and
enslaving the people (try finding that in your public school history
books. In the late middle age discoveries, the Vatican viewed all
natives of the Americas as "indigenous natural slaves":

"Battle of Wounded Knee" (slaughter at wounded knee): With the Sioux,
unarmed (except for a few skinning knives) and herded together like
cattle: a man in a black robe (jesuit) asked the indians if they wanted
to prey. After preying (non-catholic) the "man in the black robe" spoke
to the cavalry officer, who then ordered the cavalry troops to form a
line across in front of the defenseless indians, then ordered them to
open fire.

Until 1960 you could read, in any public library, books detailing
Vatican/Jesuit atrocities throughout the European middle age/dark age
inquisitions, since 1960 there has been a systematic removal of all
publications (after web pages, like this one, became known, several
hundred books suddenly disappeared from the Library of Congress; example:
"Confessions of The Conspirators" {to Lincoln's assassination}):
evidencing a systematic takeover of all educational material: remember
the "book burnings" in Berlin 1933?). This is further evidenced by the
remote location of Machu Picchu. And all in the name of their "holy
mother", the Church of Rome. Our own war of independence was called a
war of spiritual freedom: after seeing the purposeful destruction of
every church and synagogue in every city, village and town the British
Red Coats marched through. Every church that is except Roman Catholic.
That's recorded in: "The Light and the Glory", by: Peter Marshall and
David Manuel. Though the authors never mention the Jesuit's as the
perpetrators of these atrocities other records leave little doubt
["British Canadian Sir Henry Clinton: commander-in-chief in North
America, his troops made up of Oliver Delaney's and Cortlandt Skinner's
brigades, New York Volunteers, Queens Rangers, Orange Rangers, Loyal
Americans, Pennsylvania Loyalists, Maryland Loyalists, Roman Catholic
Volunteers, West Jersey Volunteers, Chasseurs, Royal Americans Reformees,
Volunteers of Ireland (Catholic), British Legion, Guides and Pioneers"
(Secret History of the American Revolution, by: Carl Van Doren)]. In
fact the authors try to exonerate the Jesuits. However in that attempt
they accept the information of a man who was on the team of translators
of the "American Standard version" of the bible. How anyone could put
their trust in a person who would associate himself with a group of men
of which 33% were known affiliates with communist fronts and causes is
beyond me ("None Dare Call It Treason", by: John H. Stormer,1964). The
correlation of the Vaticans role in the instigation and continuance of
the Revolutionary War is clearly evidenced in: "The Paris Peace Treaty of
1783". A synopsis of Vatican orchestrated atrocities can be seen when
reading: "Foxes Book of Martyr's". This book also shows the direct
correlation between the submission demands placed on the inquisition
victims, by Priests, and the Papal encyclical to the Second Vatican
Council, promulgated 25 May 1995 i.e. recognizing the Pope as the vicar
of Christ (Christ incarnate); taking part in communion that recognizes
the wafer of unleavened bread (Eucharist) as the literal body and blood
of Christ, and making it an essential part of being a member of the body
of Christ. For this to be a part of R.C. dogma is of no consequence,
but to say that the R.C. Church has not only the authority, but the
obligation and duty to God to apply it to every person, of every
religion, that has been baptized in Christ's name (willing or unwilling),
and that the sole purpose of the Vatican and its ecumenical movement is
to bring about this end, is to expose the fact that the Vatican has not
changed its dogma, stand, purpose or methods since the start of the
inquisitions. Here are a few paragraphs: "We can now ask how much
further we must travel until that blessed day when full unity in faith
will be attained and we can celebrate together in peace the Holy
Eucharist of the Lord. The greater mutual understanding and the
doctrinal convergences already achieved between us, which have resulted
in an affective and effective growth of communion, cannot suffice for the
conscience of Christians who profess that the Church is one, holy,
Catholic and apostolic. The ultimate goal of the ecumenical movement is
to re-establish full visible unity among all the baptized" (page 35, last
paragraph). "It is already possible to identify the areas in need of
fuller study before a true consensus of faith can be achieved: 1) the
relationship between sacred scripture, as the highest authority in
matters of faith, and Sacred Tradition, as indispensable to the
interpretation of the Word of God; 2) the Eucharist, as the Sacrament of
the Body and Blood of Christ, an offering of praise to the Father, the
sacrificial memorial and Real Presence of Christ and the sanctifying
outpouring of the Holy Spirit; 3) Ordination, as a Sacrament, to the
threefold ministry of the episcopate, presbyterate and diocanate; 4) the
Magesterum of the Church, entrusted to the Pope and the Bishops in
communion with him, understood as a responsibility and an authority
exercised in the name of Christ for teaching and safeguarding the faith;
5) the Virgin Mary, as Mother of God and Icon of the Church, the
spiritual Mother who intercedes for Christ's disciples and for all
humanity" (page 36, paragraph 7). "Consequently, for the out come of
dialogue to be received, there is needed a broad and precise critical
process which analyzes the results and rigorously tests their consistency
with the Tradition of faith received from the Apostles and lived out in
the community of believers gathered around the Bishop, their "legitimate"
pastor" (page 37, paragraph 3). The enormity of the implications of this
edict so staggers the imagination that to refuse to acknowledge this
threat to American freedoms and rights, and the enormity of its scope,
can only be construed as complicity with its intentions. If you have any
doubts at all about this all you have to do is read this edict. It is
titled: "That They May Be One". It is interesting that the pope uses the
word "they" and not "we", obviously excluding himself. After all, being
the vicar of Christ (Christ incarnate), he can't consider himself a mere
mortal (power is intoxicating, even to the extent of total distortion of
logic). This edict has been given full approval by Skull & Bones: Pat
Robertson, of the 700 Club. Also read the first and second points of the
second week of "The Spiritual Exercises of Saint Ignatius of Loyola".
Ignatius of Loyola, who's real name was Inigio Lopez De Recalde, founded
the Society of Jesus(Jesuits)1534 in Spain, and also the Illuminati
(holder of the light) [later instituted 1 May 1776 by Adam Weishaupt
(German Jesuit, who's picture is on our one dollar bill) at Ingelstadt
(jesuit) University, where he was Professor of Cannon Law, under the
direct orders of the "Black Pope"(who is a member of the Masonic Lodge of
Europe) and financed by the "House of Rothschild" (In 1777 Weishaupt was
initiated into the Masonic Order, the Lodge of Good Council, in Munich,
to infiltrate and control it. At the Masonic International Congress at
Wilhemsbad July 1782 the Masonic leaders received Illuminati
indoctrination) (U.S. branch of the Illuminati is: "Council on Foreign
Relations", of which U.S. Supreme Court judges: Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(Catholic), Stephen Breyer (Catholic) and Sandra Day O'Conner are
members, Bill Clinton, George Bush, Newt Gingrich, etc.); "Trilateral
Commission" and "Skull & Bones" of Yale University]. De Recalde was also
a Crusader (Vatican army that raped Israel, and most of Europe, in the
dark age inquisitions). Interlocked Illuminati fronts are: United
Nations, Bilderberg Group, Club of Rome, Royal Institute For
International Affairs (England), Tri-Lateral Commission and Council On
Foreign Relations.

Jesuit spiritual exercises are a daily ritual for Jesuits. A copy
is easily obtainable thru the Internet. Let me quote a couple of lines:
"The first point is to put before me a human king chosen by God our Lord,
whom all Christian princes and men reverence and obey. The second, to
look how this king speaks to all his people, saying: It is my will to
conquer all the land of unbelievers. Therefore, whoever would like to
come with me is to be content to eat as I, and also to drink and dress,
etc., as I: likewise he is to labor like me in the day and watch in the
night, etc., that so afterwards he may have part with me in the victory,
as he has had it in the labors". Third week, first day, fifth point: "The
fifth to consider how the Divinity hides itself, that is, how it could
destroy its enemies and does not do it, and how it leaves the most sacred
Humanity to suffer so very cruelly". In the bull: Unam Sanctam (by: Pope
Boniface VIII, promulgated 18 Nov 1302) we see the Vatican's intention of
using governments and their agencies to achieve Vatican goals: "We are
informed by the texts of the gospels that in this church and in its power
are two swords; namely the spiritual and the temporal. For when the
Apostles say: "Behold here are two swords" [Lk 22:38] that is to say, in
the church, since the Apostles were speaking, the Lord did not reply that
there were too many, but sufficient. Certainly the one who denies that
the temporal sword is in the power of Peter has not listened well to the
word of the Lord commanding: "Put up thy sword into thy scabbard" [Mt
26:52]. Both, therefore, are in the power of the church, that is to say,
the spiritual and the material sword, but the former is to be
administered-for-the Church but the latter-by-the Church; the former in
the hands of the priests; the latter in the hands of kings and soldiers,
but at the will and sufferance of the priest": This self grandiosing
butchery is espoused in more definitive terms, in the catholic
publication: "Toward a Catholic Constitution", 1996, by: jesuit: Leonard
Swidler (professor of catholic thought and interreligious dialogue,
Temple University, Philadelphia Pa.): "One need look no further than the
now accepted bulwark of orthodoxy (conformity to an established belief or
doctrine), Thomas Aquinas, to see how far the prevalent assumptions about
the compenetration of religion and politics, with the presumed supremacy
of the former, extended at that time. In treating of heretics Thomas
views them as common criminals. Their crime is even greater than that of
counterfeiters, for ""it is much more grievous to corrupt the faith . . .
than to falsify money." Therefore, heretics "may not only be
excommunicated, but may justly be killed." The church should properly
tolerate their existence for a while, so long as there is some reasonable
hope for conversion, but when that is gone, then heretics (anyone not
catholic) must be cut out like rotten flesh," as Jerome says. They
should be handed over "to the secular judge to be exterminated from the
world through death." (pg. 58). This edict was included in cannon law
until May of 1983: This should be sufficient to convince you of the
militancy of the Vatican, Illuminati and their method of administration
[now we know what was behind the raid on Mount Carmel in Waco (pilot
program to establish future policy)]. Nowhere is this policy more
obvious than in the Balkans. The "Dogmatic Constitution on The Church"
proclaimed by pope Paul VI, 21 Nov 1964: 20. Paragraph 3: "with priests
and deacons as helpers, the bishops received the charge of the community,
presiding in Gods stead over the flock, of which they are the shepherds
in that they are teachers of doctrine, ministers of sacred worship and
holders of office in government." Ireland is a typical example of this
policy.

"There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after
God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become
unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no not one. There throat is
become an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the
poison of asps is under their lips: whose mouth is full of cursing and
bitterness: their feet are swift to shed blood: destruction and misery
are in their ways: and the way of peace have they not known: there is no
fear of God before their eyes." Romans, 3:11-18.

Ironically the jesuits are feared (and highly disliked) among the
Catholic clergy more than anywhere else (there is inner-clergy rivalry
within the R.C. orders, not unlike that of the upper-echelon of the Third
Reich: they know the jesuits for what they really are). Not too
surprising since the jesuits answer only to the "Black Pope". The
jesuits do for the Vatican what the, jesuit trained, S.S., S.D., S.A. and
Gestapo did for the Third Reich.

Frans Von Papen, (jesuit) Hitlers mentor, chancellor of Germany
(June 1932 - March 1933) and first vice-chancellor of the Third Reich,
stated in his book: "My Conversations with Hitler": "Hitler has put into
practice the high ideals of the papacy". This statement was made in
reference to the death camps. As chancellor, von Papen's first act was
to dissolve the Reichstag; his second was lifting the ban on Hitlers
"Brown Shirts" (SA); he then integrated Catholic youth groups into the
"Hitler Youth": setting up the civil and political base for Hitler and
t