Pedophile Rings Linked To Vatican: NY District Atty. Halts Investigation

Former NY Cardinal Spellman linked to 1980’s pedophile rings by NY police detective

By Greg Szymanski, JD
Dec. 21. 2010

Readers recently wanted the Arctic Beacon to emphasize the connection between Vatican influence and money to the 1982 kidnapping of newspaper boy Johhny Gosch.

John “Johnny” David Gosch was kidnapped on September 5, 1982, at age 12, only two blocks from his home in West Des Moines, Iowa, while delivering newspapers. Soon after, he was drugged, molested, sold, and prostituted.

His complete story can be found at www.justiceforjohnnygosch.com

The connection to the huge pedophilia ring operating in this country was recently made on Greg Szymanski’s Investigative Journal radio show several months ago at www.libertyradiolive.com by former New York City police detective Jim Rothstein.

Rothstein, appointed by the governor of New York in the early 1980s to get to the bottom of the pedophile rings, found solid evidence leading to the doorstep of then Vatican Cardinal Spellman as well as high level government officials and businessmen in and around New York City.

Rothstein said the investigation was quashed by District Attorney Robert Morgenthau to protect the “bigshots”.

Instead of wiretaps being authorized on Spellman, who Rothstein said was one of “the most powerful and evil men” in the U.S., the evidence was confiscated on Morgethau’s orders, leading to a travesty of justice of enormous consequences.

“Morgenthua is still in office and still covering up the massive pedophile rings,” added Rothstein, who is privately helping Noreen Gosch, the mother of Johnny has been trying to get justice for her for more than 25 years. “The problem today is even worse than in the 1980s and in light of all the children kidnapped off the streets, there has never been one investigation that has gone right to the top in order to nab the perpetrators.”

Several people from the Des Moines are who listened to the Rothstein radio interview said the former investigator needs to look into the Vatican connection to the local police department, the Des Moines Register, Gosch’s employer, and WHO radio station.

The connection between the above organizations and organizations like the Knights of Columbus and Knights of Malta needs to be investigated, according to several Iowa readers.

Further, readers said people investigating the pedophilia rings need to thoroughly understand biblical authority when it comes to understanding the Vatican’s influence behind advancing perversion and child abuse.

“I don’t know what it is going to take to wake people up,” said Des Moines area radio personality Tom Friess, who hosts a morning talk show on Liberty Radio Live.

“Des Moines is home to one of the most powerful “clear channel” AM radio stations in the country, WHO 1040. Its logo is an owl, the same owl logo used at Bohemian Grove. Bohemian Grove and the Vatican are connected to the Gosch case. If investigators like Rothstein want to get to the perpetrators of the Gosch kidnapping they need to look into the local archdiocese’s connection. We must ask why the local archdioces was dropped as a defendant in the recent Franklin cover up case?”

Friess also emphasized behind the scenes Vatican involvement in pedophilia, homosexuality and child abuse as well as anti-biblical religious practices like idolatry and changing the commandments of God need to be fully comprehended in order to understand how the Vatican instigates and finances pedophilia and pornography.

Freiss added people need to read Exodus Chapter 20 and Romans Chapter 1 to get the complete picture.

Further, Frank O’Collins, author of The Almanac of Evil, in a recent article gave a historial perspective into the Vatican’s thirst for perversion and the occult.

Here is what O’Collins had to say:

Child Molestation (to “Molest” also known as Pedophilia) is when an adult engages in intimate sexually related contact with a child under the generally accepted completion age of puberty. It is also one of the oldest and most sacred rituals of the Roman Cult since the 14th Century in enabling the “sacrificing of innocence” of children to Moloch without having to physically kill them as had been the tradition under the worship of Cybele and Moloch.

Etymology of the word “Molestation”
The words Molestation/Molest come from the 14th Century religious term “Mollista” created from Moll (from Latin Mollis meaning “soft, weak, young child/boy) and Ista (Latin suffix used to indicate adherence to a certain doctrine or custom).

The original official and religious meaning of Molest (Mollista) is “the adherence to the doctrines and customs (of the Roman Cult) concerning the soft, weak, and young child/boys.”

The common definitions ascribed to “molest”—from late Latin molestus meaning
“troublesome, disagreeable, annoying” are deliberately misleading and designed to hide the religious origin and religious significance of the word.

For example, the Latin words laedo ledo which mean “strike, hit, hurt, damage, offend, annoy, violate” were in historic use for hundreds of years to defined the exact same claimed meanings of molestus –defying a rational explanation why a new word like “mollista” (molestus) was needed, unless it had a different implied meaning.

To add to the confusion, the word Molestation was again altered in its apparent “common” meaning by being introduced into Scottish law by 1456 to mean “the harassing of a person in his possession or occupation of lands” as well as English common law as “injury inflicted upon another.”

As a sacrifice of “innocence” to Moll (Moloch)

In spite of the deliberate efforts to confuse both the origin and key original religious meaning of the word “Molest”, there exists strong evidence of a second important meaning of the word in relation to the common meaning of Moll in the 14th Century onwards.

In England, the word Moll by the 16th Century became a common euphemism for “criminal” and prostitutes became commonly known as “Molls”—the claim it is a shortened version of Mary a ridiculous diversion.

However, prior to the word Moll becoming associated openly with the notion of criminals, it appears the word was used at least from the 13th Century as a shortened version of the name of Moloch and actions undertaken in the name of Moloch, or “Molls”.

This gives us then a second important and credible religious meaning associated to the word “Molest” being “the adherence to the doctrines and customs (of the Roman Cult) concerning the soft, weak, and young child/boys and a sacrifice to Moloch.”

The modern clinical term Pedophilia

The term Pedophilia (first recorded in 1951) is a modern term created from the Greek words (gen. paidos) “child” (see pedo-) + philos “loving.”

Contrary to public belief, the term Pedophilia has the unfortunate literal meaning of “loving children”, than the criminal action of child abuse. While Pedophilia has absolutely no religious significance as a word, its continued use as a term to describe child molestation and child abuse is misleading—implying those branded as “pedophiles” have some emotional empathy towards their victims (implied by philes/philos-love).

The history of religious and systematic abuse of children

To date, the Roman Cult, otherwise known as the Vatican is the only organization in history to orchestrate as a “sacred” religious ceremony the systematic and widespread encouragement of its clergy to abuse of children from as late as the 14th Century.

The physical and mental abuse of tens of millions of children for 700 years by the clergy of the Vatican is the largest unbroken “child abuse ring” of all time, still in complete operation today.

The motivation for such evil remains the dedication of the innocence of children to the demon god of sacrifice- Moloch either consciously or unconsciously by the Roman Catholic and some Christian clergy.

Due to the lack of understanding of religious terms and the true meaning of words, some parents with children under the care of Catholic clergy mistakenly believe that the Roman Cult of the Vatican have openly repudiated the “sacred act” of molestation—a false assumption.

The Vatican – always precise with their words—has condemned pedophilia which is a modern term and has absolutely nothing to do with the ancient worship of Moloch, nor the religious term molest/molestation.

No parent who values the sanctity of the innocence of their children should ever believe that their children are safe in the hands of Catholic Clergy until the Roman Cult and Vatican is disbanded. Until that day, all children in the care of Catholic Clergy remain at extreme risk throughout the world from ongoing, encouraged molestation.